1. red-lipstick:

Erica Williams - Dignity Of Kings          Drawings: Ink on Bristol
http://ericawilliamsillustration.com/dignity-of-kings/

    red-lipstick:

    Erica Williams - Dignity Of Kings          Drawings: Ink on Bristol

    http://ericawilliamsillustration.com/dignity-of-kings/

  2. "And I saw a pale horse, and the name of him who sat upon it was Death, and Sheol joined him and authority was given to him over a fourth of The Earth to kill with the sword, with starvation, with Death, and by the animals of The Earth."
    Revelation 6:8 (via philosophy-of-praxis)
  3. interruptions:

Holbein, “Death and the Abbott.”

    interruptions:

    Holbein, “Death and the Abbott.”

  4. useduniverse:

Painting by Fred Gambino

    useduniverse:

    Painting by Fred Gambino

  5. spittingonhegel:

    hey coca cola

    fuck you

  6. narcoticonatural:

Rashomon- Akira Kurosawa

    narcoticonatural:

    Rashomon- Akira Kurosawa

  7. whatmakespistachionuts:

    That is, the cinema may be dead, but that death means only the disembedding of its techniques from any supposed essence and the scattering of its operations out.  Its capacities remain to be, and are, picked up and carried to potentially better use.  The tracking shot, moving not on rails or Steadicam but in a plain hand along the trail of the blood of protesters, here makes sense.  In three senses: it alone makes sense of that physical duration of a brutalized body, a duration that becomes clear insofar as it is not in a body but spilled and smeared out across the ground; it produces sense afar out of the too-easily abstracted fact of bloody and desperate struggle; and it makes sense of a technique, a formal operation.  It makes sense of the last by raising to a bristling fever pitch the unsupportable gap between the seeming neutrality of a technique and the fact – that blood – that it records, elaborates, and by which it is transformed.

    - Evan Calder Williams, Whose blood that camera follows and follows still

  8. "Marx argues that capital is nothing but accumulated labour. His distinction is thus between accumulated labour and labour per se or, as he often puts it, accumulated labour versus ‘living labour’. ‘What is the growth of accumulated capital? Growth of the power of accumulated labour over living labour’; ‘capital does not consist in accumulated labour serving living labour as a means for new production. It consists in living labour serving accumulated labour as a means for maintaining and multiplying the exchange value of the latter.’ But if the distinction is between accumulated and living labour, then it makes perfect sense to treat the former, capital, as ‘dead labour’. Hence ‘the rule of the capitalist over the worker is nothing but the rule of the independent conditions of labour over the worker … the rule of things over man, of dead labour over living’."

About me

Towards an Apocalyptic Marxism ☭

"Communism is for us not a state of affairs which is to be established , an ideal to which reality [will] have to adjust itself. We call communism the real movement which abolishes the present state of things. The conditions of this movement result from the premises now in existence."---- The German Ideology, 1845